Black Friday is Now! Don’t miss out on up to 60% OFF InvestingProCLAIM SALE

US Pandemic Checks Had No Lasting Impact on Poor, Study Shows

Published 07/07/2022, 03:10 AM
© Bloomberg. Food is distributed during a mobile food pantry in Immokalee, Florida. Photographer: Spencer Platt/Getty Images

(Bloomberg) -- The nearly $1 trillion in stimulus checks during the pandemic likely had no long-lasting impact on recipients’ financial well-being, and in some cases increased their feelings of distress around money, a study found.

Researchers surveyed more than 5,000 Americans living in poverty to find out how effective the unconditional cash transfers were. Recipients increased expenditures for a few weeks, but the extra money had no long-term impact on spending or savings, according to the paper, published Tuesday.

“These results suggest that the cash allowed participants to spend more money, improving objective financial outcomes for the few weeks immediately following the transfer and then dissipating thereafter,” wrote the researchers, led by Ania Jaroszewicz at Harvard University’s Institute for Quantitative Social Sciences. 

The survey covered three groups: the first received a one-time payment of $500, the second got $2,000 and the third nothing.

In the two weeks following the payment, the first and second groups spent $26 and $82 more per day on average, respectively, compared with the control group. Both groups also had higher bank balances immediately after getting the money. Expenditures and bank balances returned to levels similar to that of people who received no payment about four weeks later. 

The cash recipients also did more poorly on financial, psychological and health measures in the survey. This is consistent with the notion that receiving some money -- but not enough -- makes the gap between needs and resources more salient for low-income individuals, which is source of distress, according to the paper.

“These results hint that while the cash did not actually produce worse outcomes in some objective sense, in some situations it made recipients feel worse,” the researchers wrote.

In the survey, participants mainly used the checks to make debit and credit card payments, pay bills, buy food, shop and fund transportation. The study, which was conducted from July 2020 to May 2021, found no evidence that the extra money helped reduce bank fees, including overdraft and late payment penalties. 

Read More: Cash Payments Were Lifeline for Low-Income Americans in Pandemic

The researchers pointed out that the three rounds of stimulus checks in the US covered small amounts of money compared with people’s financial needs, especially those living in poverty. The checks ranged from $600 to $1,400 for each adult and $500 to $1,400 per qualifying child.

Larger amounts could have a long-term impact. That type of relief package would be costly, though, so it may be more useful to partner future cash payments with increased community resources, the researchers wrote.

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

© Bloomberg. Food is distributed during a mobile food pantry in Immokalee, Florida. Photographer: Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.