Silgan Holdings Inc. (NYSE:SLGN) reported a robust financial outcome for the first quarter of 2024, achieving the upper range of its adjusted earnings per share (EPS) forecast. Despite a 7% decline in net sales due to mixed volume results, the company delivered strong adjusted earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) and adjusted net income per diluted share.
Silgan's management expressed confidence in the company's performance and confirmed its full-year adjusted EPS growth projection of 7%, with an anticipated adjusted net income per diluted share between $3.55 and $3.75.
Key Takeaways
- Silgan Holdings met the high end of its expected adjusted EPS for Q1 2024.
- Net sales declined by 7%, while adjusted EBIT and net income per diluted share remained strong.
- Full-year 2024 adjusted EPS growth is projected at 7%, with adjusted net income per diluted share forecasted to be $3.55 to $3.75.
- The company experienced mixed volumes but expects destocking trends to end in H1 2024.
- Q2 is anticipated to show improved volumes and operating performance, with adjusted earnings per diluted share estimated at $0.82 to $0.92.
Company Outlook
- Silgan confirms its full-year 2024 estimates, projecting continued financial health.
- The company anticipates a positive volume inflection in Q2 and a solid order book for the quarter.
Bearish Highlights
- The Metal Containers segment is facing a decline in fruit and vegetable volumes due to a customer's reduction in pack volume.
- Net sales for Q1 dropped by 7% compared to the previous year, influenced by lower volumes.
Bullish Highlights
- The Dispensing and Specialty Closures segment saw strong market demand and increased promotional spending.
- The Custom Containers segment showed improved volumes and signs of recovery from destocking trends.
- There is a strong demand for Silgan's global dispensing products in the fragrance and beauty sector.
Misses
- Despite overall strong performance, the company did not provide specific details on the extent of volume declines in the Metal Containers segment.
Q&A Highlights
- CEO Adam Greenlee addressed concerns about metal procurement amid trade sanctions, confirming Silgan's advantage due to its size and scale.
- Greenlee reassured that consumer demand for Silgan's products remains resilient, particularly for non-discretionary items.
- Discussions with customers about inventory levels have shifted from days on hand to dollars on hand due to inflation.
In summary, Silgan Holdings has navigated the first quarter of 2024 with a steady hand, meeting its financial targets despite some challenges in volume. The company's leadership remains optimistic about the rest of the year, underpinned by strong demand in key segments and strategic cost reductions. Investors and stakeholders are advised to look forward to Silgan's Q2 performance update in July for further insights into the company's trajectory.
InvestingPro Insights
Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) has demonstrated resilience in its Q1 2024 performance, meeting the upper end of its adjusted EPS expectations. The company's financial health is further underscored by several key metrics and InvestingPro Tips that investors should consider.
InvestingPro Data highlights a P/E Ratio (Adjusted) for the last twelve months as of Q4 2023 at 14.37, suggesting a reasonable valuation relative to earnings. The company's market capitalization stands at $4.77 billion USD, reflecting its significant presence in the packaging industry. Despite a revenue decline of 6.6% over the last twelve months as of Q4 2023, the company's Gross Profit Margin remained solid at 16.58%, indicating effective cost management.
InvestingPro Tips reveal strategic financial management by Silgan's leadership. The company has been aggressively buying back shares, which may signal confidence from management in the company's value. Additionally, Silgan has raised its dividend for 20 consecutive years, showcasing a commitment to returning value to shareholders. This consistent dividend payment, maintained for 21 consecutive years, coupled with the expectation of profitability this year, paints a promising picture for investors.
For those interested in a deeper analysis, there are 5 additional InvestingPro Tips available, providing valuable insights into Silgan Holdings Inc.'s financial and operational performance. To access these tips and enhance your investment strategy, visit https://www.investing.com/pro/SLGN and use the coupon code PRONEWS24 to get an additional 10% off a yearly or biyearly Pro and Pro+ subscription.
Investors should also note the company's low price volatility, which may appeal to those seeking stability in their portfolio. As Silgan Holdings continues to navigate market challenges, these insights could prove crucial in assessing the company's future performance and investment potential.
Full transcript - Silgan Holdings (SLGN) Q1 2024:
Operator: Good day. And welcome to the Silgan Holdings First Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. Today’s conference is being recorded. At this time, I’d like to turn the presentation over to Mr. Alex Hutter, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.
Alex Hutter: Thank you and good morning. Joining me on the call today are Adam Greenlee, President and CEO; Bob Lewis, EVP, Corporate Development and Administration; and Kim Ulmer, SVP and CFO. Before we begin the call today, we would like to make it clear that certain statements made on this conference call may be forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made based upon management’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events impacting the company, and therefore, involve a number of uncertainties and risks, including, but not limited to, those described in the company’s annual report on Form 10-K for 2023 and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Therefore, the actual results of operations or financial condition of the company could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. In addition, commentary on today’s call may contain references to certain non-GAAP financial metrics, including adjusted EBIT, adjusted EBITDA, free cash flow and adjusted net income per diluted share. A reconciliation of these metrics, which should not be considered substitutes for similar GAAP metrics, can be found in today’s press release and under non-GAAP financial information available in the Investor Relations section of our website at silganholdings.com. With that, let me turn it over to Adam.
Adam Greenlee: Great. Thank you, Alex. We’d like to welcome everyone to Silgan’s first quarter 2024 earnings call. We’re off to a solid start in 2024 and our team delivered another quarter of strong financial performance while making progress towards our long-term strategic objectives in delivering on our multiyear cost improvement initiatives. We delivered first quarter adjusted EPS at the high end of the expected range, with strong operational and cost performance, driving our results as the Silgan team remains focused on managing the items that are within our control. While volumes in the first quarter were mixed relative to our expectations entering the quarter, we continue to believe that the broad destocking trends we have been experiencing over the past year are coming to a conclusion during the first half of 2024 and are seeing positive trends early in the second quarter. Additionally, in certain instances, we have seen customers accelerate their first half of destocking initiatives to be more weighted to the first quarter than initially expected and we continue to see positive activities from our customers in the marketplace with increased promotional spending in 2024 that has expanded to include more of the products we produce. Turning to our segments, our Dispensing and Specialty Closures segment delivered another strong quarter as market demand for our global dispensing products remains strong, with significant momentum in the marketplace. Our market-leading innovation, production and service capabilities, and excellent operational execution continue to drive compelling value for our customer partnerships. Consumer demand for our food and beverage products continues to be strong, and we have been encouraged to see increased promotional activity in the market for many of these products as seasonal demand begins to accelerate. As expected, our customers’ destocking plans for the first half of 2024 impacted our volumes in the quarter, and in some cases, destocking plans have been accelerated to be more weighted to the first quarter. In Metal Containers, we continue to make progress on our cost reduction initiatives during the quarter and believe we are well-positioned to service the market from our low-cost manufacturing network, while maintaining the ability to grow volume through our market-leading pet food platform. First quarter Metal Container volumes were fairly consistent with our expectations as our customers worked to achieve the majority of their first half destocking initiatives in the first quarter. Our Custom Container segment delivered strong results in the quarter, with volumes improving sequentially for the first time in several quarters as we saw strong volumes related to the commercialization of new products. In addition, custom, excuse me, in addition customer order patterns began to show signs of recovery from the destocking trends we have seen over the past several quarters. Turning now to our outlook for the full year of 2024, we continue to believe the business is positioned to deliver volume and profit growth, and are pleased to confirm our estimates for the year, which includes adjusted EPS growth of 7% at the midpoint of our guidance range. We continue to expect Dispensing and Specialty Closures volumes to grow by a mid-single-digit rate, with high single-digit growth in our dispensing products and low single-digit growth in our closure products, driving better profitability for the segment with improved mix. Metal Containers volumes are expected to grow by a low single-digit percentage as we continue to expect mid-single-digit growth in pet food, which represents approximately half of our overall volume for the segment, but now expect that growth to be partially offset by lower pack volumes in 2024. Fruit and vegetable volumes, which represent roughly 20% of our Metal Container volume, are now expected to decline by a mid-single-digit rate as a large pack customer has announced plans to reduce their North American pack in 2024 to pursue a reduction of working capital and to decrease its financial leverage. This decrease will lead to both lower volumes and unfavorable fixed-cost absorption in our system in 2024. Custom Containers volumes are expected to grow by a low single-digit percentage, with volumes inflecting positively in the second quarter and improving through the year as destocking trends conclude and new commercial awards continue to provide incremental volume and profit contribution through the year. As we enter the second quarter, we’re confident that our focus and our active and effective management of these factors that are within our control will lead to another year of strong financial results for the company. Our strategic growth initiatives continue to see success in the market and shape the company’s future and our customer partnerships remain strong. With that, Kim will take you through the financials for the quarter and our estimates for the second quarter and full year 2024.
Kim Ulmer: Thank you, Adam. As Adam highlighted, our business continued to deliver strong financial results in the first quarter, despite evolving customer plans and we delivered adjusted EPS at the high end of our expected range. Net sales of approximately $1.3 billion declined 7% from the prior year period, driven primarily by lower volumes in each of our segments and the pass-through of lower raw material costs. Total adjusted EBIT for the quarter of $135.5 million decreased by 9% on a year-over-year basis, primarily due to lower volumes in each of the segments. Higher adjusted EBIT in Custom Containers offset expected lower adjusted EBIT in the Dispensing and Specialty Closures and Metal Container segments. Adjusted net income for diluted share was $0.69, with lower volumes primarily driving the year-over-year decline. Turning to our segments, sales in our Dispensing and Specialty Closures segment declined 8% versus the prior year, primarily as a result of lower volume mix of 8%. The decline in volume was driven primarily by first half 2024 customer destocking activities in domestic food and beverage markets, which accelerated during the quarter to be more weighted to the first quarter. First quarter Dispensing and Specialty Closures adjusted EBIT decreased $5 million versus the prior year period, with strong price costs, including mix, that overcame the negative impact of the sell-through of higher cost metal closure inventory in Europe due to lower metal costs in 2024, and partially offsets the negative impact of lower volumes. In our Metal Container segment, sales declined 8% versus the prior year, driven primarily by lower volumes of 5% as compared to very strong volumes in the prior year period. Destocking priorities continued to weigh on order patterns throughout the quarter, and similar to our Dispensing and Specialty Closures volumes, we did experience customers accelerating first half destocking priorities to be more first quarter weighted. Price mix was negative 4% in the quarter as a result of the contractual pass-through of lower raw material costs. As expected, Metal Containers adjusted EBIT was below the prior year quarter primarily due to the impact of unfavorable price costs, including mix, mostly as a result of the sell-through of higher cost inventory in our European business due to lower metal costs in 2024 and the impact of lower volume in the quarter. In Custom Containers, sales declined 3% compared to the prior year quarter, driven by a 3% decline in volume. Custom Containers adjusted EBIT increased $100,000 as compared to the first quarter of 2023, primarily due to improved price costs, including mix, which more than offset the impact of lower volumes. Looking ahead to 2024, we are confirming our estimate of adjusted net income for diluted share in the range of $3.55 to $3.75, a 7% increase at the midpoint of the range as compared to $3.40 in 2023. This estimate includes corporate expense of approximately $25 million, interest expense of approximately $170 million, a tax rate of 24% to 25% and a weighted average share count of approximately 107 million shares. From a segment perspective, mid-single-digit percentage total adjusted EBIT growth in 2024 is expected to be driven primarily by the Dispensing and Specialty Closures and Custom Container segments, with Metal Container segment adjusted EBIT below the prior year record level, primarily due to the previously discussed reduction in fruit and vegetable volume. Based on our current earnings outlook for 2024, we are confirming our estimate of free cash flow of approximately $375 million in 2024, with CapEx of approximately $240 million. Turning to our outlook for the second quarter of 2024, we are providing an estimate of adjusted earnings in the range of $0.82 per diluted share to $0.92 per diluted share, as compared to $0.83 per diluted share in the prior year period. The 5% year-over-year improvement in adjusted earnings in the second quarter at the midpoint of the range is driven primarily by improving volume trends and operating performance in each of the segments, partly offset by unfavorable price costs, including mix in our metal container segment. Second quarter adjusted EBIT is expected to be above prior year levels in Dispensing and Specialty Closures, with improved price costs despite a continuing but lesser impact from the sell-through of higher-cost European metal closures inventory, due to lower metal costs in 2024, and a low- to mid-single-digit improvement in volumes in the quarter. Second quarter Metal Containers adjusted EBIT is expected to be below the prior year record level, with volumes comparable to the prior year period. The year-over-year decline in Metal Containers adjusted EBIT is driven by unfavorable price costs, including mix, predominantly due to lower production volume in the quarter and the negative impact on fixed-cost absorption, with the previously discussed reduction in fruit and vegetable volumes for a large pack customer. Second quarter adjusted EBIT in the Custom Container segment is expected to be modestly above prior year levels, as a result of low single-digit volume growth. That concludes our prepared comments and we’ll open the call for questions. Anna, would you kindly provide the directions for the question-and-answer session?
Operator: Yes, ma’am. Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And we’ll take our first question from Ghansham Panjabi with Baird.
Ghansham Panjabi: Hey, guys. Good morning.
Adam Greenlee: Good morning, Ghansham.
Ghansham Panjabi: Hey. So, Adam, on the accelerated destocking at the first quarter that you called out, I assume that was, to some extent, a pull-forward from what you previously expected in the second quarter as well. Can you just give us a bit more color on that, which categories were most impacted as you kind of think about the various operating segments?
Adam Greenlee: Yeah. I think you’ve got the right way to think about it, Ghansham. I mean, we had expected some destocking activity primarily in food and beverage, again, mostly in North America for our business, to impact the first half of the year. And what we saw, again, we talk a lot about our customer relationships, but just kind of in those regular discussions that we have with our food and beverage customers during the first quarter, several made the decision to bring forward that destocking activity, and really, they increased the percentage of their sales from their inventory. And that affected late in the first quarter our shipment volume. So really, we were really right on plan kind of halfway through the quarter as far as our volume expectations. And so what’s interesting is, that did happen late in Q1. We’re sitting here on May 1st, so we’ve got a pretty good read how Q2 has started now too, at least from a volume perspective. So we’ve started Q2 strongly. So we are seeing the benefit of that volume returning and the positive inflection that we were anticipating for Q2. That’s with the month of April already behind us. And our order book for Q2 is really solid right now. So we believe that we’re reaching that inflection point that we’ve been talking about for some time. Again, product specific, you know, you can think about pet food on the metal container side, and you can really think about our beverage business in the Closure -- Dispensing and Specialty Closures segment.
Ghansham Panjabi: Okay. Great. Thank you. And then just as a follow-up question to that. So if your customers pull-forward inventory destocking into the first quarter, does that necessarily mean that they’ve changed their promotional cadence as they look out to Q2 and beyond? I’m just asking, because, obviously, you’ve seen a slight reacceleration of input costs and so on and so forth. So has there been any change in terms of your customers, the dialogue with the customers as it relates to promotional activity?
Adam Greenlee: Really there hasn’t. We’ve got pretty good intel into that spend for promotional activity in Q1 and how that compares to the prior year. And so the increases that we were expecting were actually realized in Q1. And I think the important part of that, at least for our product, Ghansham, those promotional activities were pretty effective for our customers. So they were pleased with kind of that very directed, targeted promotional activity for the products that they were looking to promote and it did lead to incremental sell-through. I think the other thing for us is, we talk a lot about promotional activity in food and beverage. It certainly has expanded outside of those two categories into other segments for us and other parts of our business. And you can talk about home care, you can talk about lawn care, personal care, other products. We’re seeing increased promotional activity across those segments as well.
Ghansham Panjabi: Fantastic. Thanks so much.
Operator: We’ll now take our next question from Gabe Hadje with Wells Fargo Securities.
Gabe Hadje: Good morning, Adam.
Adam Greenlee: Good morning, Gabe.
Gabe Hadje: I just had a question. You called out 20% of the pack mix of your Metal Containers business being fruit, veggie. Are you -- would you disclose how much of that might be co-located with your customers? And we asked a similar question earlier today, just in terms of reading articles about imported full cans of food, just trying to measure risk across the portfolio?
Adam Greenlee: Sure. Maybe for that first question, look, I think, when you think about fruit and vegetable for us, just the business model itself, right, we’re nearsighted to where those products are grown, right? They typically are grown across a certain set of acreage, then they’re aggregated to a filling site. We’re really close to where the products are actually filled. So that’s broadly across our fruit and vegetable category. So that’s how I’ll answer the first part of that. Clearly on the import of finished goods, that’s something that we’ve been tracking for some time. We continue to monitor that, and in fairness, Gabe, we’ve seen that over time with some fruit products, particularly coming from Asia. But as far as what’s in our business today in fruit and vegetable, it really hasn’t had much of an impact at all. It’s really not a material volume that we’ve seen coming through and really just not enough to impact our customers’ business at this point.
Gabe Hadje: Okay. Thank you. And then maybe a little bit trying to tie together the Q1. I think segment profit or EBITDA, however you want to think about it, was generally in line, despite the little bit of a weaker volume backdrop. And so when I think about the rest of the year and kind of this multiyear cost out program, did you guys perform a little bit better on that? I mean, I know you still called out $20 million, I think, for this year, keeping another $30 million on the table for next year. But was it just -- what was the offset, better performance? And then, like I said, that $20 million, is there potential for this year to be a little bit better than that or let’s just kind of wait and see?
Adam Greenlee: It’s a really good question. And as we look at Q1, what I’d tell you, Gabe, we have a very stable kind of operating environment for the first time in several years. And so we’re sort of back to the Silgan playbook. I mean, we are good operators at the end of the day. And really, I think, the primary impact of the first quarter was really just really good, solid operating performance. And our normal continuous improvement activities really benefited the quarter and all the other programs that we’ve been working on. That’s in addition to the multiyear $50 million cost reduction initiative. So, we made really good progress. We’ve got several plans that we’ve rationalized. We’ve got assets that are, if not already in the location they need to be, they’re on their way. So we’ve made significant progress. There was a little savings in the first quarter from that $50 million project, but really it was much more about the Silgan operating model and our continuous improvements that drove great operating performance in the quarter.
Gabe Hadje: Good to hear. Thank you.
Adam Greenlee: Thank you.
Operator: We’ll now take our next question from George Staphos with Bank of America.
George Staphos: Hi, everyone. Good morning. Thanks for the details. Hope you’re doing well. I guess I want to take a different sort of approach to the question of destocking. So to the extent that your customers accelerated destocking in the quarter, Adam. Does that, I know your order books are good and that’s encouraging, but does that give you any concern about what your customers are thinking about their volume outlook for the year, their ability to get product whenever they need it through the supply chain, right? I mean, you get restocking when, as a purchasing manager, you’re worried it’s going to cost you more. You’re worried you’re not going to be able to get it. You’re worried that demand 00 your supply won’t keep up with demand. So is there kind of a gray cloud in this narrative that, yeah, destocking is nearly over. Yes, it was accelerated. That’s all wonderful. But it’s probably because your customers are worried a little bit about the outlook in the second half of the year. How would you have a think about that?
Adam Greenlee: Yeah. It’s an interesting take. I think, again, what I would tell you is sitting here a month into the quarter, we can talk specifics about maybe pet food as an example, where we did...
George Staphos: That was coming next.
Adam Greenlee: It was a late -- okay. Well, it was a late addition to the destocking activities last year, right? So it was one of the primary categories that was going to linger into 2024 in the first half. And so that was an area where we saw the accelerated de-stocking activity. April shipments were terrific and we’re seeing the growth in the order book for May and June back to where it should be. So, again, as you know, George, we’re so close with these customers where we are on-site, near-site, that we’ve got a pretty good understanding of what they believe their demand forecast looks at or looks like, excuse me, going forward. So I don’t think it’s a gray cloud. I think actually the good news is that we’re just about done talking about destocking, because I think the larger impact in the first half just happened in Q1 and we’re sitting here with quite a bit of confidence that we have reached that inflection point for our volumes as we sit here in the middle of Q2. The other thing I would tell you, just as an indicator, run over to our Custom Containers business for just a moment, and really a different volume story really than what we were talking about in the other two businesses at this point and the changing order patterns we were referencing, it’s -- there’s good end-consumer demand and then there’s also short order lead times where one of the items that we were concerned about is our inventory -- as our customers reduced their inventory, they didn’t have enough to meet the end-consumer demand. We’re getting these kind of short order -- short lead time orders, certainly in the Custom Container business to support end-consumer demand. And so we just think for our products, which for the most part aren’t discretionary, demand still has been very resilient and we feel confident about the volume outlook.
George Staphos: Thanks for that, Adam. Next question that I had is, and I think Gabe had sort of teed it up, and if you had answered it, I wasn’t quite sure what the ultimate view was. But are you seeing any concerns, do you have any concerns about procuring metal, steel or aluminum, given the various trade sanctions and other things that have been bantered about? I know the last few years have probably been very good learnings and learning periods for everybody, no less than for Silgan, I wouldn’t imagine it’s an issue, but nonetheless want to check that box. How do you view that right now?
Adam Greenlee: Yeah. Sure. I think it’s a good question. There’s a lot of change going on, particularly on the metal supply base, and as you know, with our size and scale, we feel like we are advantaged in getting the raw materials that we need to support our customers. So it has not been a problem for us, it’s something that we actively manage each and every day, but our teams have done a really good job of maintaining that supply chain all the way throughout and we talked a couple years ago, particularly on the aluminum side, about how we extended our supply chain and the network of suppliers that support our business…
George Staphos: Yeah.
Adam Greenlee: … and that’s been beneficial as we work through any supply chain challenges, but as we sit here today, we’re confident in our ability to procure the materials for our customers’ products.
George Staphos: Last question for me and I’ll turn it over. Have you seen within your segments any sort of evidence of, and maybe you commented on this earlier, if you did, I’d missed it, in terms of a trade-down or a move by the consumer to lower price point, more staple types of products and that showing up in your results, or really not seeing that at all across your various categories and customers? How would you have us think about that from Silgan’s perspective? Thank you.
Adam Greenlee: Yeah. Right. Again, another really good question. I think Q1 is probably too early to try to draw a conclusion in our products for that, but I go to our Custom Container segment, where we have seen that increase in the short lead time orders, where consumers are seemingly focusing their spend on more non-discretionary items, and again, that’s really where we play with our business in all three segments, our primarily non-discretionary spend. So I think our order books would say our products are continuing to do well, our consumers remain resilient, but I think there is a component of that, George, that these are mostly non-discretionary products, and I think, we’ll be able to comment further on that at the end of Q2, as we see those volumes play through.
George Staphos: Thanks so much, Adam.
Operator: Our next question will come from Matt Roberts with Raymond James. And it looks like he appears to have lost his connection. We will move to Daniel Rizzo with Jefferies.
Daniel Rizzo: Hi. You mentioned non-discretionary spend being up, but I was wondering if you look at fragrance and beauty, if that’s still kind of intact as well or if consumer trends are perhaps shifting away from that. I think in the past, you mentioned that that’s kind of fairly stable as well?
Adam Greenlee: Yeah. Actually, I mean, demand for our global dispensing products remains really, really strong. So, that’s really unchanged for us and as we think about fragrance and beauty, we’ve spent some time talking about which part of that market that we play in and we are at the very high end of the kind of premium luxury end of that business and those consumers really have not really changed their procurement patterns over some long period of time now. So, really, we feel like those are largely unaffected. And then for some of our other dispensing items, we -- as we were preparing for some of our cost-out initiatives, there were some instances where demand did outstrip our capacity. We put -- we built inventory to move a couple of lines and had quite a bit of demand on those products. So, that was part of our shortfall in Q1 that will indeed recover in Q2, and, again, part of why we have such good confidence that DSC in particular is going to see a nice inflection in volume in Q2.
Daniel Rizzo: Does the increase in short lead time orders suggest that your customers are willing to live kind of hand-to-mouth, so to speak or can we expect a restock cycle, a real restock cycle, I don’t know, sometime in the second half or shortly thereafter?
Adam Greenlee: Yeah. It’s a really good question. I probably would try to answer that similarly to how I just answered George’s question. I think there’s a combination of things, Dan, and again, it’s all underlying in consumer demand remains strong for our products. We believe, and we talked about a lot last year, that we thought there were instances where our customers were taking inventory levels below historic levels and we were having good conversations about that and maybe the need to replenish those. So, there’s a combination in Q1 of that happening. The order book’s really strong for Q2. I’m sure it’s a combination of those things as well. So, I think, it’s a really good question that we’ll have more detail at the end of the second quarter to really provide a stronger opinion of what we really think is happening. But it clearly is a combination of all those.
Daniel Rizzo: And last question, do you get higher price points for short lead time orders? Does it matter really? I mean, the length of, I don’t know, the length?
Adam Greenlee: It does depend. And I mean, remember, most of our business model is long-term contractual arrangements. So, for that part of our business, no, not really. Those prices are set over a long period of time with very calculable pass-through methods, et cetera. For our more transactional business, yes, we do.
Daniel Rizzo: Okay. Thank you very much.
Adam Greenlee: Sure.
Operator: We’ll now take a question from Matt Roberts with Raymond James.
Matt Roberts: Hey. Good morning, everybody. Let’s see if I can get this right. Sorry for the user error.
Adam Greenlee: That’s all right.
Matt Roberts: Quickly, on the fruit and vegetable customer, could you give a little more color on the timing of when that occurs or is it just ongoing and wind down through 2024? And it seems like you reiterated your volume outlook in Metal Containers for the year versus a couple months ago. So, are there any offsets within that segment we should be thinking of?
Adam Greenlee: Yeah. Look, for the timeline of the communication and how it impacts Silgan, a couple things. One, the customer we’re talking about announced it publicly kind of in mid-March. So, we were working with them a little bit before that just to understand, and frankly, help them through the thought and planning process of how to implement a change like what they changed. As far as Silgan is concerned, how it affects us, again, most of our pack volume is in Q3. That’s when our shipments are. As we’ve talked a lot about, we make -- we build inventory. We make hands all year long. And so, really, for us, we’ve got a production shortfall now in Q2, because we would have been building inventory for that particular customer for shipments in Q3 along with the pack. So, you’ve got some lost absorption in Q2 and then, as we turn to Q3, that’s where you’ll see the volume impact. So, hopefully, that’s clear. And then just remind me…
Matt Roberts: Very clear.
Adam Greenlee: … Matt of your second part.
Matt Roberts: I was going to say, are there any offsets within the container segment?
Adam Greenlee: Yeah. Yeah. So…
Matt Roberts: …low single-digit…
Adam Greenlee: In fairness, you’re exactly right. So, in fairness, we’re probably to the lower end of the range that we provided now versus maybe being at the higher end of kind of low single digits. So, we’ve got pretty good visibility to it now and feel comfortable that we’re going to have growth in 2024.
Matt Roberts: Okay. Thank you, Adam. And then, on the $20 million in savings in 2024, I think, you said there was a small portion in 1Q. Are there any changes to that or how we should think about the timing throughout 2024? And hypothetically, if volumes didn’t recover as expected, have you identified any incremental opportunities that could exist beyond the $50 million?
Adam Greenlee: Let me take the back part of that question. I’ll pass it over to Kim to take the first part. So, as far as, how we view responses to, maybe potential volume reductions later in the year, I mean, number one, we are focused on driving cost out of our business each and every day. It’s just part of our DNA and it is what we do. We’re really focused on right-sizing our capacities to the demand that we see with our customers and really don’t think that there’s any change to that as we sit here today. But that’s an ongoing iterative process that we really do work on each and every day in each of our businesses. And remember that we’ve got some nice growth opportunities as we sit here today in each of our segments as well. And with that, I’ll throw it to Kim.
Kim Ulmer: Sure. So, of the $50 million cost reduction program, we had identified $30 million of cash this year, as well as $20 million in savings and most of that savings will be in the back half of the year. We have fully identified the savings and the cost to achieve it and we’re on track.
Matt Roberts: Perfect. Thank you all very much.
Operator: We’ll take our next question from Mike Roxland with Truist.
Mike Roxland: Yeah. Thanks, Adam, Bob, Kim, and Alex for taking my questions. Adam, just one thing, a little more color on where you’re seeing demand outstrip your capacity. What are you doing to address that demand in those categories given what seems to be very strong order books on a go-forward basis?
Adam Greenlee: Yeah. That’s a really good question. I probably should have been clear when I was talking about that. So, it is in our global dispensing business. So, you know, that is an area where we have been adding capacity over time. In this particular instance, it’s a product line that, again, we had a plan that we had worked through with our customers to relocate a couple of assets to increase capacity. And as we did that -- as we took those lines out of production and were relying on inventory, our customers’ demand picked up just a bit. So, they stripped through the inventory that we had agreed upon prior to the asset move. The good news, that was in the first quarter, that assets -- those assets are in place and producing now again in Q2. So, unfortunately, it’s a blip, but it’s a good reason for a blip in that our customers’ demand has remained very strong and we’re now in a better position to supply that from a lower cost and from a higher capacity standpoint.
Mike Roxland: Got it. Thank you for the color. And then just continuing on Dispensing and Specialty Closures, last quarter you mentioned some business wins. I think you highlighted that again, the press release. Can I provide some more color on those wins and maybe what the cadence is and their deployments throughout 2024?
Adam Greenlee: Sure. I think in Dispensing and Specialty, I mean, it really is more on the higher value products and talking about new product launches and fragrance and beauty. I’d rather not give the names of what those are. But again, just think about where we play in those segments. Again, it’s the premium kind of luxury end of that profile that just has continued to experience really good growth for years now, regardless of what the economic circumstances are. So, I think, really, that’s where we’re having tremendous success and we’re having really nice success in other parts of the business. That’s the one that we tend to focus our conversations on.
Mike Roxland: Gotcha. Just one more in here, because you did mention earlier high single-digit growth in dispensing for the year. You’re not really seeing any of your customers feed at all. Although, when you look at some of the companies that have reported on the fragrance side, their volumes have been a little bit lackluster, with certain companies, even like this morning, as they let are calling out a weaker China. So, how do you reconcile, I guess, your growth in terms of premium or high-end fragrance with what some of the beauty companies have posted over the last couple of weeks or last few months?
Adam Greenlee: Yeah. It’s a good question, Mike, and it’s a couple things. One, again, it’s the sub-segment of that market that we participate in, back to that premium and luxury end. So, that’s part of the answer. The other answer is, I mean, our team’s doing a really good job. We’re winning in that market. Our innovation, our design and research capabilities are clearly advantaged and being rewarded in that market space. We’ve become sort of a go-to in that market. So, with new product launches, we are winning a disproportionate amount of those new product launches and that’s really what’s driving our growth that I think is going to look a little different than what those luxury retailers or fragrance companies, like maybe the ones you mentioned, are going to show in their full company results. We’re in a sub-segment that continues to grow at a very nice clip.
Mike Roxland: Gotcha. Thanks for all the color and good luck in 2Q.
Adam Greenlee: Thank you.
Operator: We’ll now take our next question from Arun Viswanathan with RBC Capital Markets.
Arun Viswanathan: Great. Thanks for taking my question. Congrats on the solid Q1 in the face of continued destocking here. So, I guess, I wanted to ask about two things. First, I think, maybe could you just comment again on what you’re seeing on the promotional side and are you hearing from your customers that they’re accelerating their destocking because the interest rate environment is still very high and the carrying costs are high, and thus we wouldn’t really see any kind of restocking until the interest rate environment normalizes? And then further on that point, are they conversely saying that, look, we’re just going to start doing more with lower inventory and operating a little bit more just in time? Is that a structural change, or I mean, you guys have been in this industry for a long time, so I just wanted to get your perspective on how your customers are really managing their own order portfolio? Thanks.
Adam Greenlee: Sure. Regarding promotional activity, again, what we’ve seen in several categories and it’s not just in Metal Containers. It also applies to Dispensing and Specialty Closures and Custom Containers. There is a notable increase from our customers on their promotional spend in the marketplace. And certainly, I think, we focus the next part of the conversation on Metal Containers. We think that spend is being very effective. It’s an efficient spend that’s very targeted, and where they allocate those promotional activities, they are seeing success. And I think the best example of that, we can probably even go back a quarter or two and talk about the soup category, that around the holidays, very targeted promotional activity that drove the volume activity that they were desiring, and it was very successful. They are rolling that out in 2024 as part of their marketing campaign as well. So, we think it’s a more effective and more efficient spend that’s very targeted, and we think, so far, the results have been quite good. So, we’re very encouraged by what that means for our customers in 2024, and therefore, our volumes as well. For destocking, look, I think, the interest rate conversation is an interesting one. I think that was part of our discussion last year, is really, destocking really sort of, as interest rates were rising, excuse me, destocking activity accelerated. And so, we’re just in regular dialogue, trying to make sure we understand where inventory levels are, where they should be, and how that compares to historic norms. So, I don’t think anyone at this point in our customer realm is saying that we now want to live with inventories well below our historic norms just because of interest rates. In fairness, I think, our customers are talking about volume growth in 2024 as a key objective for their businesses, and in fairness, they need to have some inventory in place to do that, because our lead times just don’t support the turnaround that they need to have short order recovery of orders from consumers. So, it’s an interesting question. I don’t think the interest rates are driving any destocking activity at this point.
Arun Viswanathan: Okay. Thanks for that. And just as a quick follow-up, is there any way you could quantify inventories, whether at your level or your customer level, whether it’s days of supply or weeks? I mean, last year we heard that inventories were, at the retail level, destocking from, say, eight weeks down to four weeks or something like that. But I guess, yeah, I just wanted to get your thoughts on that. And then, you also mentioned something about non-discretionary. I guess we are a little bit -- I’m just a little bit struggling with that just because it seems like some of these categories that appear non-discretionary are inflation sensitive as well. So, maybe just give us your thoughts on that question around inflation and the impact on your volumes? Thanks.
Adam Greenlee: Sure. I mean, I think, I’ll just take the last one first. And just for me, as I sit here and think about our core products, go to food cans for just a minute, and you think about it’s a meal. Soup is considered a meal. That really is not discretionary. It’s not a supplement. It’s not a snack. It’s not something that is an accompaniment to another category. And I’d also go with pet food as an example. Those are full meals for pets and it’s half of our volume. So, for us, we just don’t think that our products really are discretionary by any real stretch of the imagination on the metal container side. We’ve got functional beverage and other food and beverage products as well. And I think the rest of our business is less discretionary than maybe what some of our competition has as well. So, and then trying to quantify the inventory levels, I think, our commentary on that last year, Arun, is that our discussions with customers quickly turned, call it, maybe midyear, from the days on hand to kind of a dollars on hand discussion, given all the inflation that they had taken, not only in their packaging materials, but everything else that goes through with their products and ingredients, et cetera, and we’re starting to transition back now to talking about unit level inventories versus dollars. So, I think that’s an important point. Unit level inventory is down, and we’re now working very closely with our customers to figure out what the right level of inventory is going forward. But I don’t believe, again, anyone is believing that they would be operating with inventory levels significantly below their historic norms as we go forward from a planning purpose.
Arun Viswanathan: Thanks.
Adam Greenlee: Okay.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] And we’ll now take a follow-up from Gabe Hadje with Wells Fargo Securities.
Gabe Hadje: Hey, guys. I’ll be brief. Thanks for taking the follow-up. I just wanted to ask, I think, one of the large functional drink customers that you’re talking about your service here in North America restaged kind of how they get product to market. I’m curious if you experienced any impact from that or if it was discernible from this quote-unquote long-term destocking phase that seems to now persist for 18 months, generally speaking, across packaging?
Adam Greenlee: Yeah. We agree. It’s gone on longer than any of us had anticipated for sure. As far as that change and how they’re supporting the market, really for us, it does not touch our business. It’s just whether the distribution point is a direct store distribution or through a third party really doesn’t affect us in really any way, Gabe. It’s more about the end consumer demand that drives our volume versus how the product gets to retail.
Gabe Hadje: Okay. Great. Thank you.
Adam Greenlee: Okay.
Operator: And it appears there are no further telephone questions. I’d like to turn the conference back to our presenters for any additional or closing comments.
Adam Greenlee: Great. Thank you very much, Anna. And I appreciate everyone’s interest in Silgan’s performance in Q1. Look forward to discussing our Q2 performance in July. Thank you.
Operator: And once again, that does conclude today’s conference. We thank you all for your participation. You may now disconnect.
This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.