Please try another search

There is a growing divergence of views among FOMC members. Some remain dovish, favoring more rate cuts. Their argument is based on a belief that inflation will continue to move toward the 2% target and that the weakening labor market benefits from lower interest rates. On the other side of the aisle are hawkish views.
Unlike the doves, they are concerned that inflation could become entrenched at 3% or higher. They do not view the recent weakness in the labor market as overly concerning. The divergent opinions can result in mixed messages from the Fed. As a result, the market was expecting a “hawkish easing.” Was the tone of yesterday’s meeting hawkish, less dovish, or even more dovish?
As we share below, the Fed made very few edits to the prior statement. Given so little has changed, it’s hard to say the Fed has become hawkish. Moreover, as we circle below on the left side, the Fed will begin purchasing Treasury Bills to expand its balance sheet by $40 billion a month and provide the markets with liquidity.
Despite what they may or may not call it, it’s QE. QE is dovish. Given that they stopped QT on December 1 and restarted QE, we would have to characterize the statement as more dovish. Yesterday’s policy change was undoubtedly not a hawkish cut as many expected.
During the press conference, Chairman Powell alluded to the labor market continuing to weaken and his belief that excess inflation is mainly due to tariffs. In fact, he claims inflation would be near 2% if not for the temporary impact of tariffs. His message appears slightly more dovish than at the previous meeting.
Based on the statement, QE, the press conference, and the Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) discussed below, we characterize the Fed’s policy stance as more dovish. It’s worth noting that there were three dissenting votes: one in favor of cutting by 50 bps and two hawkish votes in favor of keeping rates unchanged.
On a quarterly basis, the FOMC polls its members for forecasts on where GDP, unemployment, inflation, and the Fed Funds rate will be at the end of the current year, as well as the following three years and the “longer run.” The SEP is also referred to as the Fed dot plots, as each member’s projection is plotted on a scatter plot, as we share in the second graphic.
Of note:

A generation ago, a single income could support a family, buy a house and pay for a vehicle or two in the driveway. Today, even two high earners are struggling to purchase a new...
I get a lot of questions about what could go wrong. My answer is deflation. Specifically, much of our consumer inflation was tied to shelter costs based on Owners’ Equivalent...
Global equity markets opened the week without a unified direction as Asia sold off while Europe and U.S. futures attempted to stabilize, revealing how sensitive risk appetite has...
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.